I stand by Rippetoe firmly in our shared belief that bicep curls are retarded.
They don't hit that many muscle groups, so the hormone response is small.
It's not an especially functional exercise.
And bicep curls have the 90's small connotation.
And yet today, there I was, doing them in the mirror like some sort of 90's small tiny-armed douche.
Why was I doing this?
Because the local power-lifting competitions have stupidly substituted the "strict standing bicep curl" in place of the squat. I have a couple ideas why.
-Easier to judge. Curls don't have the depth issues that squats do.
-Draw in new participants. By picking a popular exercise, one lots of people think they're good at, you might pull in new contestants.
Sure these are tangible benefits. BUT AT WHAT COST?
Dios mio.
Workout today was:
Back Squat: 300 x 5s x 5r
Bench: 190 x 5s x 5r
Bicep Curl: 82.5 x 5s x 5r
Saturday, April 3, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Followers
Blog Archive
-
▼
2010
(83)
-
▼
April
(28)
- Upping Squat Routine Again
- Today's workout (SORE CALVES)
- 2 weeks off from benching, then 250lb bench
- John Broz, end of week 1
- John Broz, one bad dude
- Good Lifting Today
- Went Up So Easy
- Manly Dinner
- 17 April 2010 workout
- Reverse Hypers will F You UP!
- Day wrap up
- Changes I'm introducing starting tomorrow (11 Apri...
- Lon Kilgore article
- Res Ipsa Loquitur
- John Welbourn
- Laying it out (clarified goal statement)
- Unusual, but interdependent, Metrics and Mini Goals
- Can a largely unfit person train to have a 300lb-b...
- Nutrition and Purpose, in all seriousness
- 3.3 MILES!
- 8 April 2010, Lifting/running, 305 x 5 x 5, follow...
- Douglas Coupland . . . And Running
- What is it with Douglas Coupland?
- awesome new recipe
- So, how's the barefoot running going?
- I am a hypocrite
- David Goggins is a fiend.
- Running? Surely you jest.
-
▼
April
(28)
No comments:
Post a Comment